(This is version 5 of this post, published on my experimental wiki using the permanent versions pattern. Version control in the footer.)
The ATmosphere is the right ecosystem to bet on for developing decentralised collective intelligence, but it requires more than just exchanging 300-character status updates (more: Bluesky Adoption Challenge). How would moving MyHub.ai onto the ATmosphere help?
My basic answer can be found in my January 2023 manifesto posts, but that was before I understood really anything about ATProtocol. I've therefore created this page to collect my evolving ideas for how those ideas would translate onto the ATmosphere.
The basic idea is to:
The platform therefore acts as an on-ramp—a simple starting point for newcomers - which doesn't lock them in, because users:
I developed my content pipeline to help tackle the firehose of content coming at me.
!
(from Thinking transparently in the ATmosphere, December 2024)
In its simplest form, it's:
Not shown: Editors should also be able to invite Trusted Friends to collaborate within their Library, but I'll leave that for later as the necessary technology (permissioned data, aka ATprotocol Spaces) is still under active development at the protocol layer.
Today, a Hub is one of these personal public sites - it's the public facing edge of my thinking and writing stack, combining:
It is published on the myhub.ai platform, which I launched in March 2020. As you'll see from my Hub (https://myhub.ai/@mathewlowry/):
Note that a Hub not only brings together a Hub Editor's content from across the web, it "knows" an enormous amount of what interests the Editor, which is handy for any personal AI assistant.
Both ends (Inbox and Public Site) of each thinking/writing stack can be connected to everyone elses' via ATproto and other protocols (RSS, ActivityPub, SMTP):
!
The above figure shows:
There's plenty which is not shown: comments to hosted Hub items, for example, can be shared via the commenter's Bluesky account, widening conversation reach.
I want to both develop the myhub.ai platform to support this and provide credible exit to local-first alternatives, so two development paths are required:
!
I'm starting with this, as most of the pieces are already in place:
Right now I'm developing:
Next:
Once all that's done I will have the content on my PDS, but noone will see it unless I have a website to display it, which brings me to...
The myhub.ai platform will need to be rebuilt. While it already provides the basic public-facing end of the pipeline, it needs the ability to display content on a PDS (for those using the above local-first path) plus, for everyone else:
That's not as much as it sounds, because the goal is not to build a rival to Obsidian inside the MyHub Editor - the Platform path exists to provide an easy on-ramp for new users, who can export their content to the local path to access Obsidian's power at any time.
The single most important development the Atmosphere needs to grow is for someone to create something some people are prepared to pay for.
The above local-first development path provides credible exit: any user can get started on MyHub in the knowledge that at any point they can export their content from the platform into markdown files on their hard drive, and use Obsidian (or its alternatives), Groundmist and their own CMS and web server.
They can even exit partially - there's nothing stopping somebody managing their content using Obsidian, for example, but using the MyHub platform for the public-facing site.
But if anyone on myhub can jump ship for free alternatives at any time, how will it pay for itself?
Some people enjoy fine-tuning Obsidian and configuring Groundmist, their PDS, CMS and servers, but I'm betting many others will pay a couple of euros a month to have myhub take care of it for them, safe in the knowledge that if it goes in a direction they don't like they can always take the local-first path.
Moreover, the fully-featured Hub you'd get for your subscription will be a Substack on steroids:
a) Better content offering: Editors will be able to offer subscribers access to some or all of the Editor's finished posts (as in Substack, Ghost, etc.), plus:
As a result we will support creators for not just creating, but also curating, high-value content, and integrate this content into social and collaborative networks.
b) Better content productivity: then there's the productivity bonus the Editor gets from the integration between the inbox, the reading queue and thinking tool with their public and subscriber-only publishing engine.
Finally, the marketplace will be open - designers and developers will be free to develop and market new site types and designs.
This is one of this wiki's pages managed with the permanent versions pattern described in Two wiki authors and a blogger walk into a bar…